|
Post by Rams on Jan 15, 2006 22:15:29 GMT -5
Post any questions or comments here on the league rules, or rule changes.
|
|
|
Post by Packers on Aug 22, 2006 7:52:08 GMT -5
How will waivers work? I'm sorry, I know I ask this every year and it has most likely been discussed and I most likely missed it.
I know you can have 16 players and I will only have 13 after the draft and may or may not have a DE/DT?
Here is what I found in the rules........
"Your roster may have more than 16 players up until the start of the regular season. After that you must have only 16. "
"Waivers will begin after the first week of the season has been completed. The waiver order will be determined by the following (the final criteria used may vary slightly):
Overall winning percentage Power ranking as determined by MFL.com Total points scored YTD Reverse order of opponents total points against Head-to-head record Conference winning percentage Divisional winning percentage
Owners may enter waiver requests starting Tuesday through Saturday. The commissioners will process waiver requests twice per week, Thursday and Saturday mornings (any time after 12:00 AM CT). There will be four rounds of waivers processed twice each week. Team owners may make up to four requests during each of the two waivers process."
Thanks
|
|
|
Post by Rams on Aug 22, 2006 18:43:57 GMT -5
We always run 1 waiver before the first week. I will process them Wednesday night/Thursday morning at Midnight central on September 7th.
After the draft is over, you may submit waiver requests at any time, but they won't be processed until that Thursday morning.
The waiver order will be the reverse of the original draft order for the initial process, then it goes by the process in the rules.
|
|
|
Post by kelcknud on Dec 18, 2006 15:01:34 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Rams on Dec 19, 2006 1:35:10 GMT -5
Trying to make the Super Bowl exciting are you?!? When did the Ravens switch back to a 3-4 defense? They had him listed as a 4-3 DE all year. Oh well, Hali it is!
|
|
|
Post by kelcknud on Dec 19, 2006 7:01:40 GMT -5
Trying to make the Super Bowl exciting are you?!? When did the Ravens switch back to a 3-4 defense? They had him listed as a 4-3 DE all year. Oh well, Hali it is! for the most part, i dont think its that big of a drop off for you, hali has been playing great lately
|
|
|
Post by Rams on Dec 19, 2006 11:27:06 GMT -5
Agreed, and he has a great matchup this week as well. Oakland even made the Rams defense look good!
|
|
|
Post by kelcknud on Dec 19, 2006 11:42:32 GMT -5
Agreed, and he has a great matchup this week as well. Oakland even made the Rams defense look good! no crap
|
|
|
Post by hblackwell on Dec 20, 2006 19:41:25 GMT -5
How about points for running backs catching a pass?
|
|
|
Post by Rams on Dec 20, 2006 19:56:01 GMT -5
How about points for running backs catching a pass? We don't do that because RBs are already too valuable and hard to get. Giving TEs and WRs PPR evens the playing field out so a team can still be competitive with out a top 5-10 RB. Right now the top 20 players looks like this: QBs - 5 RBs - 4 WRs - 6 LBs - 4 DBs - 1 Pretty even if you ask me, it would be way lopsided if we gave RBs PPR.
|
|
|
Post by oakland on Dec 29, 2006 13:46:15 GMT -5
How about points for running backs catching a pass? I think we should visit this subject. I could see something like rb's=.5 per, wr's=1 and te's=1.5 making things as fair as possible. Right now I dont believe a RB makes the difference and even team's with fair wr's stand better chance even if they dont have a startable rb and TE's even at 1.5 wont be worth squat but maybe a little more. RAidah's
|
|
|
Post by Packers on Dec 29, 2006 20:46:48 GMT -5
How about points for running backs catching a pass? I think we should visit this subject. I could see something like rb's=.5 per, wr's=1 and te's=1.5 making things as fair as possible. Right now I dont believe a RB makes the difference and even team's with fair wr's stand better chance even if they dont have a startable rb and TE's even at 1.5 wont be worth squat but maybe a little more. RAidah's ;D I like it.
|
|
|
Post by Rams on Dec 30, 2006 13:11:30 GMT -5
I think we should visit this subject. I could see something like rb's=.5 per, wr's=1 and te's=1.5 making things as fair as possible. Right now I dont believe a RB makes the difference and even team's with fair wr's stand better chance even if they dont have a startable rb and TE's even at 1.5 wont be worth squat but maybe a little more. RAidah's ;D I like it. I'm sure you do Mr. LJ.
|
|
|
Post by oakland on Dec 30, 2006 14:18:39 GMT -5
? LJ only has 36 receptions sofar wich would equate to 18 points in this setup. Just over a point a game not much damage there. It would mostly help give some value to those 3rd down backs......oh and Reggie Bush lol. Not in favor of point per reception vs my proposal of .5 per cause alot of RB's get 3-4 reception for zippy or even negative yds and shouldnt get full credit for dumpoff passes to avoid sacks....However we need to equal the value of all positions and their contributions to the game.
|
|
|
Post by Rams on Dec 30, 2006 19:59:58 GMT -5
I wanna thank you Broncos, had you not done this I would probably have started Suggs over Hali. Every cloud has a silver lining!
|
|