|
|
Post by Rams on Nov 5, 2009 10:46:01 GMT -5
From now on the commissioners will enforce the following:
Any ineligible player that remains on IR after gametime on Sunday (12pm central) will be removed by the commissioners. The commissioners will collectively decide on the appropriate roster move to make. The commissioners will do the following:
• If an open roster spot is available the commissioners will simply activate the player.
• If no open roster spot is available the commissioners will check to see if another player on the roster is eligible for IR. If so the player will be activated and the eligible player will be placed on IR.
• If there is no eligible players to replace the ineligible player, the commissioners will decide which player on the team to release from the roster.
The commissioners decision is final, so please be sure to check your IR players every week before Sunday at gametime. Thanks.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 7, 2015 20:24:35 GMT -5
Ok, so how do we the players get to enforce when a player has been put on IR/PUP and yet the system does not let us deactivate him to IR?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 8, 2015 11:43:09 GMT -5
Can the commissioners please refresh our memory on when a player is eligible to be put on IR? Thanks. I thought that Burfict would be eligible for IR but the system won't let me.
|
|
|
|
Post by Rams on Sept 8, 2015 16:50:36 GMT -5
When he is placed on "IR" or "IR designated to return".
|
|
|
|
Post by Seahawks on Sept 8, 2015 18:18:07 GMT -5
Currently Burfict is listed as Reserve/Physically Unable to Perform or (PUP). Which means he will not play the first six weeks of the season. At the end of six weeks the "real" Bengals would have to change that designation based upon his outlook at that time. It's the worse designation if you are trying to fill a roster void because you are in limbo for up to six weeks.
I think I got my GM explanation pretty close.
|
|
|
|
Post by Chargers on Sept 8, 2015 22:13:43 GMT -5
Currently Burfict is listed as Reserve/Physically Unable to Perform or (PUP). Which means he will not play the first six weeks of the season. At the end of six weeks the "real" Bengals would have to change that designation based upon his outlook at that time. It's the worse designation if you are trying to fill a roster void because you are in limbo for up to six weeks. I think I got my GM explanation pretty close. Yep, you're right. The PUP and IR are two very different things in the NFLFFL. If the player in question is on the NFL PUP, then he stays on your active roster. Same thing for Suspended players. He has to be on the NFL IR or IR-Return in order to be on the NFLFFL IR. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 9, 2015 14:10:46 GMT -5
Honestly, that is really stupid and I should be able to put him on IR instead of having him rot on my bench for 6 weeks. Whatever though, it is what it is.
|
|
|
|
Post by Rams on Sept 9, 2015 20:32:31 GMT -5
That was the point of adding the 2 extra roster spots, Bucs.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 9, 2015 22:16:09 GMT -5
I understand, thanks for the clarification.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 9, 2015 22:20:23 GMT -5
Well, I just looked and now Burfict is classified as "IR-PUP" and able to go to IR. Sorry for being dumb.
|
|
|
|
Post by Chargers on Sept 11, 2015 23:34:37 GMT -5
That was the point of adding the 2 extra roster spots, Bucs. If we didn't have those two extra roster spots now, then I wouldn't have anyone to use as my tiebreaker player. Assuming that Ladarius Green is not playing, that is. I've got (probably) five guys out this week. Yuck. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 12, 2015 10:21:06 GMT -5
That was the point of adding the 2 extra roster spots, Bucs. If we didn't have those two extra roster spots now, then I wouldn't have anyone to use as my tiebreaker player. Assuming that Ladarius Green is not playing, that is. I've got (probably) five guys out this week. Yuck. Therein is my "initial" point when it comes to increasing the activity among owners when they need to fill their lineups rather than creating a situation where owners are able to just sit on players. You would have had to use waivers or make a trade to find an active player in order to fill your lineup properly. After getting some explanations regarding the lesser level of activity of many owners though, the option for adding more roster spots is clearly justified.  |
|
