|
Post by Rams on Jan 2, 2009 12:01:44 GMT -5
This is the official declaration thread for the 2009 season. Please post here if you will be returning for 2009. A post would also be appreciated if you are NOT returning as well.
All owners must post before Feb 1st, 2009. Any owner who has not posted or contacted a commissioner will be subject to losing their team.
I will update this thread as I get everyones declarations. Thanks!
Returning for 2009:
Bears Bengals Bills Broncos Browns Buccaneers Cardinals Chargers Colts Cowboys Eagles Falcons Jaguars Jets Lions Packers Panthers Patriots Raiders Rams Ravens Redskins Saints Seahawks Steelers Texans Titans Vikings
Not returning or no response:
Chiefs (*2) Dolphins 49ers (*1) Giants
|
|
|
Post by Rams on Jan 2, 2009 12:07:19 GMT -5
Rams will be returning...
|
|
|
Post by Titans on Jan 2, 2009 12:36:30 GMT -5
Titans will be back.
|
|
|
Post by The Cowboys on Jan 2, 2009 15:57:07 GMT -5
Absolutely in!
|
|
|
Post by Eagles on Jan 2, 2009 16:45:36 GMT -5
I'm back
|
|
|
Post by Chargers on Jan 2, 2009 18:53:09 GMT -5
I'll be back. I've gotta figure out how to take that last step.
|
|
|
Post by ejones on Jan 2, 2009 20:17:06 GMT -5
I'm in
Hey Charger's maybe the key is to not be such a homer; I mean your team SUCKSSSSS branch out a little:-P
|
|
|
Post by Chargers on Jan 3, 2009 0:00:27 GMT -5
I'm in Hey Charger's maybe the key is to not be such a homer; I mean your team SUCKSSSSS branch out a little:-P LOL...I do find it rather funny that a 6-8 team is telling the back-to-back Super Bowl participant that his team sucksssss. Being a homer has seemed to work pretty well so far, I'd say. I think the real problem was that I had a couple of players on my team that WEREN'T Chargers. ;D Although I must say I do regret trading away Turner for Merriman and a 1st, et al. At least for now anyway. You're welcome, Falcons.
|
|
|
Post by ejones on Jan 3, 2009 9:54:18 GMT -5
I know; but your team just can't get over the hill. That or you just fear the Rams and you shrivel up like a little girl. But what really is the difference between a 6-8 playoff team and the superbowl loser:-P
I grew up watching them years ok; they aint that bad just don't perform well in a big game - hey that is kinda like you as a owner:-P
|
|
|
Post by oakland on Jan 3, 2009 10:54:01 GMT -5
rAIdah's will be back
|
|
|
Post by Ravens on Jan 3, 2009 13:09:32 GMT -5
Ravens will be back.
|
|
|
Post by Chargers on Jan 3, 2009 14:27:48 GMT -5
I know; but your team just can't get over the hill. That or you just fear the Rams and you shrivel up like a little girl. But what really is the difference between a 6-8 playoff team and the superbowl loser:-P I grew up watching them years ok; they aint that bad just don't perform well in a big game - hey that is kinda like you as a owner:-P Well, to be fair, I did shrivel out 172 points in the Super Bowl. Usually that would be way more than enough to win. Props to Eric for scoring seven more points than I did in the second highest scoring game in league history. C'est la vie! By the way, the last time 172 points was scored in a playoff game by anyone, it was in 2006 by Eric against you. You did manage to shrivel out 83 points that game. I'd rather lose a playoff game by 7 points than by 89 points. ;D Nice division title in 2006 though... I've got four division titles myself. In the Redskins' other playoff appearance (2003), they managed to shrivel out 52 points against- yep, you guessed it - the Rams. Eric, I bet you didn't know that you had that effect on people, did you? Anyway, good luck to you next year, Redskins, and let's move on to 2009! Maybe we'll meet in Super Bowl VIII, provided that you don't have to play the Rams in the playoffs, that is.
|
|
|
Post by Seahawks on Jan 3, 2009 18:13:18 GMT -5
The Seahawks are in
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 3, 2009 20:49:52 GMT -5
I'll be back
|
|
|
Post by jbelaska on Jan 4, 2009 0:50:57 GMT -5
im in for another round
|
|