Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 3, 2007 13:55:39 GMT -5
Maybe, but like the Colts said, the RBs are more of a gamble this year than they have been in previous years. I'd rather get a WR that is consistent than take a chance on a RB that you really aren't sure how they will perform. This may be so, but I'm still betting your 1.14 is one of those shaky RBs!   |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 3, 2007 14:00:16 GMT -5
GOD BLESS FOOTBALL ON SUNDAY!!!Even if it is just a mock draft 
|
|
|
|
Post by Rams on Jun 3, 2007 18:54:55 GMT -5
Maybe, but like the Colts said, the RBs are more of a gamble this year than they have been in previous years. I'd rather get a WR that is consistent than take a chance on a RB that you really aren't sure how they will perform. This may be so, but I'm still betting your 1.14 is one of those shaky RBs! Most likely, but I also doubt Holt, Owens, Fitzgerald, or Harrison will be there. If they are I may trade down with somebody who wants one of them. |
|
|
|
Post by Rams on Jun 3, 2007 18:57:16 GMT -5
Jason Taylor was really early at 1.17 IMO. We blasted the Skins last year for taking Bulluck at 1.15 or so, but Bulluck wasn't really that bad there honestly. A DL there is much more questionable though, unless you have all of your other bases covered I guess.
|
|
|
|
Post by The Cowboys on Jun 3, 2007 19:11:35 GMT -5
Thanks for making my pick, Lions. I was on all morning and then my wife took me out "for just an hour or so". Four and half hours later...  Johnson was my second choice there. I probably would have gone with McNabb. |
|
|
|
Post by Commissioner on Jun 3, 2007 21:22:24 GMT -5
This may be so, but I'm still betting your 1.14 is one of those shaky RBs! Most likely, but I also doubt Holt, Owens, Fitzgerald, or Harrison will be there. If they are I may trade down with somebody who wants one of them. If you need a RB and don't have five picks in the 1st round you'll have to think hard about passing on that shaky RB. |
|
|
|
Post by Seahawks on Jun 3, 2007 21:52:14 GMT -5
I guess I should have checked the time of the draft better @ 7:47pac time, I was getting ready to make my pick and see it was done for me.
|
|
|
|
Post by Rams on Jun 3, 2007 21:53:28 GMT -5
I guess I should have checked the time of the draft better @ 7:47pac time, I was getting ready to make my pick and see it was done for me. As stated, all times are central time. |
|
|
|
Post by Rams on Jun 3, 2007 21:55:29 GMT -5
I guess I should have checked the time of the draft better @ 7:47pac time, I was getting ready to make my pick and see it was done for me. Your pick was yesterday anyway, what are you talking about? |
|
|
|
Post by Titans on Jun 3, 2007 22:02:10 GMT -5
I guess I should have checked the time of the draft better @ 7:47pac time, I was getting ready to make my pick and see it was done for me. Your pick was yesterday anyway, what are you talking about? Willis |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 3, 2007 22:13:25 GMT -5
Your pick was yesterday anyway, what are you talking about? Willis Actually, that's [glow=red,2,300]"whatchoo talkin' 'bout WILLIS"[/glow]  |
|
|
|
Post by Browns on Jun 4, 2007 7:26:15 GMT -5
Thanks for making my pick, Lions. I was on all morning and then my wife took me out "for just an hour or so". Four and half hours later... Johnson was my second choice there. I probably would have gone with McNabb. d**n wimmen! |
|
|
|
Post by jbeaver on Jun 4, 2007 9:29:23 GMT -5
So my pick at 1.22, I assume is too early for this kind of league right? As I looked at other options though, I thought Bulger would give me the most points for the season overall.. I did miss on Williams ... and could have went young with Lynch or Peterson.... When do the rooks go? Does everyone try and get them in the 4th?
|
|
|
|
Post by jbelaska on Jun 4, 2007 12:08:17 GMT -5
i dont know if i like fred taylor going there he is just too be of a ? with jones-drew i can see him going to the 2nd but i can see a lot of back dropping in place of recievers simply because all of the better backs are keepers
|
|
|
|
Post by Rams on Jun 4, 2007 16:15:00 GMT -5
I think that was a little early on the QB run, but then again 1 person made all the picks. I don't expect that 1 person to get really creative on that many picks in a row.
It may have been a little early for Bulger at 1.22 Steelers, but not much. You can usually still get a decent QB in the beginning of the 2nd round. Unless you have good offensive keepers, it's hard to pass on a RB or WR in the 1st round. Top rookies will go in the 1st and 2nd round. You won't see many great rookies making it all the way to round 4, but some good ones do make it there.
|
|
