Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 13, 2014 9:34:00 GMT -5
Kendall Wright, should have gone a while ago. I think he's a steal right there. Yeah surprising to me that Hopkins, Hakeem Nicks and Mike Evans all went ahead of Kendall Wright |
|
|
|
Post by Chargers on Aug 13, 2014 11:30:26 GMT -5
Kendall Wright, should have gone a while ago. I think he's a steal right there. Yeah surprising to me that Hopkins, Hakeem Nicks and Mike Evans all went ahead of Kendall Wright Agreed. He's been at the top of my players available list for awhile. Wasn't thrilled that he was picked up by a team in my division. Nice pick, Chiefs! |
|
|
|
Post by The Cowboys on Aug 13, 2014 12:54:05 GMT -5
Kendall Wright, should have gone a while ago. I think he's a steal right there. Yeah surprising to me that Hopkins, Hakeem Nicks and Mike Evans all went ahead of Kendall Wright Now who's ball fluffing?  |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 13, 2014 15:17:12 GMT -5
I got all kinds of 3rd rounders and willing to trade down if it works for me. I'm not waiting when I'm on the board unless you have an offer in.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 13, 2014 18:56:28 GMT -5
Yeah surprising to me that Hopkins, Hakeem Nicks and Mike Evans all went ahead of Kendall Wright Now who's ball fluffing? This was more of an anti-ball-fluffing on those guys that took Hopkins, Nicks and Evans than an attempt to fluff the Rams' balls |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 13, 2014 18:57:09 GMT -5
Excellent pick, Tampa. One of the finest of the draft so far. This, on the other hand, is a blatant ball fluffing |
|
|
|
Post by Rams on Aug 13, 2014 19:20:07 GMT -5
Lmao, glad we have some entertainment since the draft has slowed to a snails pace.
|
|
|
|
Post by The Cowboys on Aug 13, 2014 21:00:44 GMT -5
I beg to differ. One cannot ball fluff when one is the first to compliment. Balls do not begin to fluff until after they have received more than one mark of approval. My pointing out the greatness of Tampa's pick was the first (and, technically, only compliment), thus it was a non-fluff. However, your comment, while anti-fluffing in nature toward the three teams that didn't pick Wright, was certainly showing appreciation for the pick (which had already been shown) and therefore qualifies as 100% ball fluffing.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 13, 2014 21:14:22 GMT -5
Speaking of slowing to a pace, Oakland rejected my trade 3 hours ago and has been on the clock the whole time.
|
|
|
|
Post by Chargers on Aug 13, 2014 21:43:28 GMT -5
Speaking of slowing to a pace, Oakland rejected my trade 3 hours ago and has been on the clock the whole time. Yeah, he was on the site two hours ago and after having already been on the clock for 2 1/2 hours, he still didn't make his pick. What gives? Along the same lines, I think it's time to dig up this chestnut of a post from the 2012 draft comments... Please Remember... Everyone Drafting Really Abhors Freakin' Timers |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 13, 2014 22:49:01 GMT -5
I beg to differ. One cannot ball fluff when one is the first to compliment. Balls do not begin to fluff until after they have received more than one mark of approval. My pointing out the greatness of Tampa's pick was the first (and, technically, only compliment), thus it was a non-fluff. However, your comment, while anti-fluffing in nature toward the three teams that didn't pick Wright, was certainly showing appreciation for the pick (which had already been shown) and therefore qualifies as 100% ball fluffing. You forget that when you remark as something being the "best" or "finest", it overrides the first mark of approval rule. You fluffed balls, my friend. I would expect someone so versed in the art of ball fluffing to have known this. |
|
|
|
Post by The Cowboys on Aug 14, 2014 0:06:14 GMT -5
I beg to differ. One cannot ball fluff when one is the first to compliment. Balls do not begin to fluff until after they have received more than one mark of approval. My pointing out the greatness of Tampa's pick was the first (and, technically, only compliment), thus it was a non-fluff. However, your comment, while anti-fluffing in nature toward the three teams that didn't pick Wright, was certainly showing appreciation for the pick (which had already been shown) and therefore qualifies as 100% ball fluffing. You forget that when you remark as something being the "best" or "finest", it overrides the first mark of approval rule. You fluffed balls, my friend. I would expect someone so versed in the art of ball fluffing to have known this. I am not sure I agree with this interpretation of the ball fluffing rules, but I must acquiesce to you. You wrote the book on the Art of Fluffing Balls and must know the proper ruling. I will humbly apologize for said accusation and will do my best to fluff no more. However, regardless of my fluffing, your silence on the fluffing allegations leveled against you constitute an admittance of ball fluffing of the first degree. You, sir, are guilty. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 14, 2014 0:31:42 GMT -5
I was surprised Stafford was falling so far. And I was quite happy to see the Dolphins scoop him up. You don't need any more help hoisting the trophy this year, Seahawks. Holy mother of god, talk about a ball fluffing. This is like the 4th or 5th ball fluff on the Seahawks. Talk about sloppy seconds (or thirds or fourths or whatever). Also if you read my post, there was no ball fluffing involved at all. It was strictly anti-fluffing. From what I can ascertain, the Chargers are the most guilty ball-fluffing franchise so far. I think it may be intervention time. |
|
|
|
Post by Chargers on Aug 14, 2014 0:35:21 GMT -5
Well, we only got ten picks in today. We did better than that in the first 3 1/2 hours of the draft. Sheesh.
Monday was awesome. We covered over a round that day. I'm hoping to see something more like that tomorrow.
#fingerscrossedbutnotholdingmybreath
|
|
|
|
Post by Chargers on Aug 14, 2014 0:37:24 GMT -5
I was surprised Stafford was falling so far. And I was quite happy to see the Dolphins scoop him up. You don't need any more help hoisting the trophy this year, Seahawks. Holy mother of god, talk about a ball fluffing. This is like the 4th or 5th ball fluff on the Seahawks. Talk about sloppy seconds (or thirds or fourths or whatever). Also if you read my post, there was no ball fluffing involved at all. It was strictly anti-fluffing. From what I can ascertain, the Chargers are the most guilty ball-fluffing franchise so far. I think it may be intervention time. Not sure why you're trying to draw me into this, David. I'm not really into trash talking, I just call 'em like I see 'em. |
|
